Asheville Housing · At a Glance
Same Federal Promise. Different Money.
Two HUD-subsidized buildings, both housing low-income residents. One was just gut-renovated; the other is stuck in a national repair backlog of about $169 billion. The difference is the funding stream each one can tap, and how much repair money the public has actually put in.
Battery Park
Public Housing
Who it houses
Low-income seniors (age 62+)
Families and individuals, all ages
Ownership
Nonprofit-owned (National Church Residences)
Publicly owned (usually a local public housing agency)
How it gets federal money
Project-based Section 8 + Low-Income Housing Tax Credits
HUD Operating Fund + Capital Fund
Can it raise private capital?
Yes: a Freddie Mac loan refinanced it in 2023
Rarely: federal grants are its main source of repair money
Recent investment
$17.6M Freddie Mac recap loan (2023); ~$13.4M set aside to renovate all 122 units
National repair backlog $169.1B; ~$3.2B/yr Capital Fund; ~10,000 units/yr lost to demolition or sale (HUD, 2010 est.)
Condition today
Recapitalized in 2023, with its renovation funded
Deferred repairs nationwide
The point
One building got its roughly $110,000 a unit. The wider system needs an estimated $188,000 a unit to preserve, and in 2010 was losing about 10,000 homes a year to demolition or disposition. The difference was never the residents; it is which financing platform a building sits on, and how much repair money the public chooses to spend.
Will YOU step up?
Every group in our directory is local, vetted, and doing this work right now. Pick one and back it. →